X-Git-Url: https://info9.net/gitweb/?p=wiki.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=tmarble%2Fposts%2FI_Copyleft_this_Crowdsourcing.mdwn;fp=tmarble%2Fposts%2FI_Copyleft_this_Crowdsourcing.mdwn;h=0e8545af0a1d04da1f89877e80e6043de4f1ee99;hp=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000;hb=25f37f45c25c5659d9a3608776e0fa9ca77c74cd;hpb=19a415cc5d45e990f04b5eafac364423cb50fee1

diff --git a/tmarble/posts/I_Copyleft_this_Crowdsourcing.mdwn b/tmarble/posts/I_Copyleft_this_Crowdsourcing.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0e8545a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tmarble/posts/I_Copyleft_this_Crowdsourcing.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# I Copyleft this Crowdsourcing
+
+Fascinating news this week about success in using 
+[FoldIt](http://fold.it/portal/info/faq) to successfully
+crowdsource the 
+[folding](http://news.yahoo.com/online-gamers-crack-aids-enzyme-puzzle-175427367.html)
+ of an "AIDS-like virus enzyme".
+
+This is a milestone in imagining a blend of human and
+machine skills for, perhaps, one of the biggest health
+related challenges we have. The technology is awesome.
+The human creativity is awesome. The goal is awesome.
+
+What's striking about this story is how little is told
+about the fruits of this effort. My guess -- and I'm
+perfectly happy to be corrected -- is that the large
+beneficiaries of this work will be pharmaceutical companies
+that will patent the molecules they discover can
+bind to such proteins.  These molecules will be the
+basis for very important cures.  And the pharma with the
+patent will have a monopoly on that molecule for 20 years.
+
+So is there even attribution for the AIDS patient who
+donated her time to FoldIt? Could she benefit from the
+medication she helped bring to market (at a reduced price)?
+
+For many years those of us in the FLOSS community have
+been raising the concern that software patents do not, in fact,
+"promote the progress in science and the useful arts".
+There is growing awareness that that software doesn't pass the
+§ 101 "machine or transformation test" and mathematics -- 
+a representation of software -- is not patent-able.
+
+The other large customers of the current patent system
+are big pharma.  Do pharma patents promote progress? 
+Would the drugs come to market anyway? An *economic* analysis
+of this market would be enlightening.
+
+If the court of public opinion pushes Facebook
+to disclose privacy policy (and implement modest controls)
+doesn't FoldIt owe it to the community to at least disclose
+the "terms of service"?
+
+