"[the combination] is inconsistent with the literal meaning of
GPLv2 section 2(b)."
-<br/>
<br/>
**Wat?**
<br/>
On one hand it's important to know if SFLC as a non-profit is, indeed,
acting in the public interest (as the IRS requires). Yet the even
-bigger issue here is would "asking for a consensus about the spirit"
+bigger issue here is **would "asking for a consensus about the spirit"
trump the written copyright license and set a scary precedent for open
-source software in general?
+source software in general?**
[[!tag sflc gpl cddl zfs floss]]
[webmink-on-cddl]: https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/choice_of_venue
[cddl]: https://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0
[freedombox]: https://freedomboxfoundation.org
-[pchestek-on-sflc]: https://twitter.com/pchestek/status/703704091227246593
+[pchestek-on-sflc]: https://twitter.com/pchestek/status/703933428341805056
[sflc-990-2013]: http://990s.foundationcenter.org/990_pdf_archive/412/412165986/412165986_201401_990.pdf
[emacsen-on-sflc]: http://blog.emacsen.net/blog/2016/02/28/why-is-sflc-siding-with-oracle-over-linux-developers/
[raison]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raison_d'%C3%AAtre