"[the combination] is inconsistent with the literal meaning of
GPLv2 section 2(b)."
-<br/>
<br/>
**Wat?**
<br/>
On one hand it's important to know if SFLC as a non-profit is, indeed,
acting in the public interest (as the IRS requires). Yet the even
-bigger issue here is would "asking for a consensus about the spirit"
+bigger issue here is **would "asking for a consensus about the spirit"
trump the written copyright license and set a scary precedent for open
-source software in general?
+source software in general?**
[[!tag sflc gpl cddl zfs floss]]